Blog and News Content

a cartoon illustration of children playing in a forest

A popular introduction to local news used to ask, “It’s 10 o’clock. Do you know where your children are?” Along the same lines, many companies in industries as diverse as insurance, transportation, construction, local governments, TPAs, self-insured groups, and restaurants are wondering where their claims managers and risk managers are. They might be in the office. They might be working from home. They might be on the road. It doesn’t matter. Wherever they are, they need access to information. And they need to be able to find the information they need as efficiently as possible.

If that was true to some extent before the coronavirus pandemic, it’s a way of life now. Some folks call it digital transformation. Some folks call it the new normal. We call it evolution and common sense. Paper’s been been on the decline in working environments for more than 20 years because digital technology has been on the rise for that same period of time. And there’s no going back.

Digging Digital

Much of the digital progress has been made in claims management and risk management. Digitization facilitates automation. Automation facilitates workflows. Workflows facilitate efficiency and productivity. Efficiency and productivity improve loss mitigation, customer service, and profitability. Digitization also facilitates better data. Better data facilitates analytics and reporting. Analytics and reporting improve decision-making. It’s a pretty straight line. And there’s more.

As data analytics and decision-making improves, so does claim prevention. By identifying trends, incident types, claims frequency, times of occurrence, affected activities, accident-prone individuals, and more, claims managers and risk managers can work with their customers and their employees to reduce the likelihood of risk.

We’d never say COVID-19 was a good thing. But it did bring about — or at least accelerate — some very good things. Because it created the need for enhanced digitalization, it created the opportunity for claims management and risk management to advance rapidly. If we can keep the momentum going, the future will be bright, indeed.

It’s 2022. You don’t need to know where your claims managers are.

two people are sitting in blue chairs talking to each other

We had a conversation the other day that made us think about the ways in which companies — even or maybe especially companies that use TPAs — go about reporting the incidents that spawn claims. We were talking with a prospect, and the conversation went something like this:

Us: What does your reporting process look like?

Them: Everything goes directly to our TPA.

Us: Every incident, every claim, or both?

Them: What’s the difference?

Us: Well, if one accident spawns a physical injury claim and a property damage claim, how do you report them?

Them: We’d report the accident.

Us: How?

Them: We could use a form or a phone number.

Us: Do the forms ever get lost?

Them: Sometimes.

Us: If you use the phone number, do you document the accident?

Them: I guess we’re not sure.

Us: Would the TPA receive or track every claim stemming from that accident?

Them: I guess we’re not sure.

Us: Are there any incidents or accidents that don’t go to the TPA?

Them: I guess we’re not sure.

Us: Since you’re not sure about what gets reported to the TPA and how it gets reported, how do you manage your reporting to ensure the right people know about accidents, to maintain control of your data, to manage your costs, and things like that?

Them: We were afraid you were going to ask us that.

They’re Not Alone

You might be surprised to know the number of companies that take it on faith that everything goes directly to their TPAs. We used to be surprised. But we’re not anymore. But it’s not a difficult problem to fix. And believe it or not, the remedy starts with the definitions of everything and directly:

Everything goes to a TPA only if you systematize the tracking of every incident, systematize the tracking of every claim to every incident, and verify every incident is going to the TPA. Everything goes directly to the TPA only if you submit everything completely and electronically. Paper forms have a way of getting lost. Phone calls have a way of getting forgotten. And here’s the bonus: Everything you track and submit directly to the TPA can be reported quickly and efficiently.

We grant you we’re biased. But tracking and reporting your claims — and managing everything in one system — feels like sound business practice to us.

Can we help you track and report your claims?

a man is holding his head in his hands in front of a bunch of icons

We don’t envy municipal risk managers. Having to contend with claims for property damage, workers compensation, and other liabilities; accidents on school yards and sports fields; resident complaints; and more other things than most of us can imagine must leave most risk managers wishing they were jugglers … or octopuses (octopi, if you prefer the Latin derivative).

But while we don’t envy them, we definitely support them.

Don’t Agonize — Organize

When you’re being bombarded with claims, public safety issues, and the other aspects of managing risk, the last thing you can afford is disorganization. That’s why Cloud Claims is incident-based, tracking each claim related to each specific incident. Consider this, however far-fetched it might be: A Department of Public works employee is out plowing snow one night. He has the driver’s side window of his truck rolled down. A neighborhood kid throws a snowball that hits the employee in the head, causes a laceration, and knocks the employee unconscious. Out cold, the employee, with his foot still on the accelerator of his truck, crosses a yard and crashes into a house.

The employee’s medical claim, his workers comp claim, and the resident’s property-damage claim would track to the same incident, including every attendant document, image, or any other related file. In addition, Cloud Claims allows you to track lost time — and to visualize risk trends, incidents vs. claims, and your areas of greatest exposure to liability.

Don’t Complicate — Automate

Even a small town can generate hundreds, if not thousands, of claims in a year. You don’t want to contend with this equation:

[the number of claims, x the documents and files associated with each claims x the time required to manage each one = weeks or months of work]

In contrast, Cloud Claims lets you contend with this equation:

[the number of claims x entry of details x electronic upload x automated workflow = weeks or months of work saved]

Add dashboards that enable you to get the reports needed, when they’re needed, and municipal risk managers reduce their own risk — of stress, of burnout, of overwork, of overtime, and of sweating the small stuff (but their juggling skills might suffer as a result of all that organization and efficiency).

As an added benefit, happier municipal risk managers may very likely result in better service and happier municipalities.

As Robin Williams would have said, “What a concept.”

a merry Christmas logo with a cartoon elf on it

Santa Claus Contends with Workers Compensation Claim

Elf claims physical injury and mental stress due to heavy workload.

North Pole — (December 20, 2021) — Saint Nicholas, sometimes known as Kris Kringle but most popularly known as Santa Claus, has had a workers compensation claim filed by one of his elves. It appears the elf suffered from Pre-Holiday Burnout (PHB), caused by the effort required to make gifts for everyone in the world. He also suffered a broken toe when he dropped a toy anvil on his foot. Mr. Claus consented to sit for an interview with a reporter from WILBUR (World Insurance-Leading Business Underwriting Report). The elf, identified only as Ernie, declined to be interviewed. What follows is a transcript of the interview with Mr. Claus, edited for brevity and clarity.

WILBUR: How are you feeling about Ernie’s claim, Mr. Claus?

Santa: Look. I know this is supposed to be the season of giving. But all this claim is giving me is grief and agita.

WILBUR: You have the proper insurance coverage, don’t you?

Santa: Well, yeah. But managing two different claims is a nightmare.

WILBUR: What do you mean?

Santa: Ernie filed one claim for physical injury for the broken toe. That caused him to file another claim for the PHB. Now I have to manage both of them.

WILBUR: What if your claims system tracked claims by incident, recording every claim resulting from that one incident?

Santa: Right. And what if reindeer could fly?

WILBUR: Uh … they can.

Santa: Okay. I forgot. But where do I find an incident-based claims system?

WILBUR: In the cloud.

Santa: You mean with the reindeer?

WILBUR: Not exactly. It’s called Cloud Claims. I’ll get you the information.

Santa: Thank you. But I have to get back to work now. I’m short one elf. Ho, Ho, Ho!

About WILBUR

WILBUR is the world’s foremost insurance authority. If it’s insurance, it’s WILBUR. For more information, please visit www.wilburinsurance.com, email info@wilburinsurance.com, or call 1-800-WILBUR1.

About Santa Claus

Santa Claus is a fat guy in a red suit who flies around the world in a red sleigh on Christmas Eve and brings everybody everything they want. For more information, please write a letter to the North Pole.

Media Contact:
JoAnna Bennett
203-341-2360
joanna@obriencg.com

the word paid is written in red on a black background

Last June, we published a post called, Clean Up Your PAID Act. It laid out the reasons that entities required to comply with the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act (MMSEA) of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and its Section 111 reporting requirements would soon be facing new mandates. Those mandates would be coming under the new compliance guidelines of the Provide Accurate Information Directly (PAID) Act. The PAID act was signed into law on December 11, 2020. As promised by CMS, the new law goes into effect on December 11, 2021. That’s Saturday of this week.

The PAID Act enable insurers to better identify claimants’ Medicare plans and to avoid unnecessary litigation. And it prevents the lawsuits that were being filed by Medicare Advantage Plans against insurers for double recovery and for failure to provide primary payment or reimbursement for qualifying charges. But it will require all responsible reporting entities (RREs) to manage additional data from CMS — data they they weren’t required to manage before the PAID Act. More specifically, the PAID Act requires CMS to deliver Medicare Part C (Medicare Advantage Plans) & Part D information to help RREs resolve liens with Medicare. That, however, requires significant changes to Section 111 reporting systems.

That means, beyond your present system’s inability to access the new fields, without changes, many systems won’t be able to process the new CMS query responses at all. That may render your current Section 111 reporting process obsolete. And it will put your CMS compliance at very real risk.

Depending on when your CMS reports are due, you don’t have much time. But with MIR Express™, we do. MIR Express is our secure system for managing your Non-Group Health Plan (NGHP) Medicare reporting. It’ll ensure you’re ready to handle CMS’s changes and to access all the valuable new information you’ll be getting from CMS right away. And we’ll make the transition painless.

If you’re already using MIR Express, you don’t have anything to worry about. And if you’re not already using MIR Express, you still don’t have anything to worry about because you can get it and be using it before your actual reporting deadlines.

We’re ready right now. Please let us know when you are.

December 11 is five days away.

a bunch of green houses are lined up on a white surface

We were flipping through an older issue of Insurance Journal the other day and came across an article with this headline: “The Complicated Risk Exposures of Property Managers and Investors”. We were okay at first, especially when we read this:

Property managers and real estate investors face bedbug exposures, mold behind the dishwasher, tenant and vendor service issues, tenants without insurance, vetting contractors, insurance claims, property inspections, tax authorities, tenant harassment and discrimination claims, and more.

That’s nothing but true, fair, and accurate. But this part freaked us out a little bit:

In most cases, the property manager is responsible for tenant screening and placement of the tenant in the investor’s property, which leads to another potential financial exposure for the property manager … Medical payments, property damage to others, additional living expenses, and contents coverage are not required or reviewed.

The fact that property managers may not be aware of the extent of their exposures is bad enough. But what really freaked us out was the reality that all those claims — whether the property manager saw them coming notwithstanding — will have to be managed.

If you were using Excel, you could record an incident. Then, if you were able to tell what claims resulted from that specific incident, you could put links to those claims in other spreadsheets or documents. That feels like a dicey proposition because it feels like a pretty big if.

When we got to this part of the article, we completely flipped:

Property management firms often assume that by having their investor add the property management firm as an additional insured on the investor’s personal homeowners or commercial multi-family policy they can mitigate all their liability exposures related to the servicing of the individual property … [but] they may be facing uninsured losses due to vacancy clauses, intentional acts or damage by the tenant, and “service animals” that could take down a moose.

The potential liability inherent in vacancy clauses and intentional acts or damage is scary enough. But the idea of heading out to a property inspection and having to face off with a service animal that could take down a moose, is terrifying — especially if the resulting claims have to do with a leg in the service animal’s choppers.

You could trust all that to Excel. Or you could use Cloud Claims. Cloud Claims won’t protect you from a service animal that could take down a moose. And it won’t read your policies for you. But since it connects incidents to claims — and claims to policies — it will protect you from disorganization and inefficiency. And it’ll help you identify patterns, assess risks more effectively, and mitigate them accordingly.

Note to Self: Give service animals a much wider berth.

restaurant with tables and chairs

Have you ever played Connect the Dots? At first it might seem like a bunch of dots and numbers. But as the dots begin to connect, the image magically appears. Restaurant claims are similar. At first it might seem like a bunch of events and numbers. But eventually general liability, personal injury, liquor liability, product liability (food poisoning, allergic reactions, hepatitis), and fire can all come together and magically reveal the whole picture.

It’s obvious enough that insurers have an obligation to fulfill the promises they make to protect against losses when they sell policies. But who protects your risk managers? How can they ensure they’re properly identifying all of the risks they’re paid to mitigate? How can they do so efficiently and coherently? And how can they connect the dots between claims to identify patterns, to improve their risk selections, and to maximize guest satisfaction?

The Whole Picture

They can start by tracking incidents, rather than claims. Here’s a scenario: One evening, Gladys, a waitress at Ernie’s Chop Joint, trips on her way across the dining room and drops a tray containing a carafe full of water and eight water glasses. The glasses shatter. As the carafe rolls across the floor, water runs into some electric sockets in the floor, causing a fire. (Claim #1, property damage.)

On its way to the floor, the carafe full of water, ricochets off the right foot of Herb, a gentleman having dinner with his wife, fracturing three metatarsals. (Claim #2, bodily injury). Herb’s wife, Grenadine, believing Gladys dumped the tray on purpose, convinces Herb to sue Ernie’s. (Claim #3, general liability.)

The risk manager now has three claims to contend with, all stemming from Gladys’s stumble, but that may be unrelated in terms of coverage. For that matter, it’s possible for the claims to be managed by different people who may have no way and no reason to connect the dots. If, on the other hand, the claims had been tracked by incident (poor Gladys), then all the dots would have been connected.

If the claims system the risk manager used tracked incidents — used tag-based organization for documents to eliminate network folders and files; attached image files, videos, PDFs, and other documentation to each incident and anchored every claim to an incident — dots would connect themselves. As a result, claims would be managed more efficiently, patterns would be more readily identified, risks would be assessed more effectively, and conditions and circumstances could be adjusted to mitigate those risks.

We can’t promise to protect Gladys. But we can definitely help the risk manager who’s trying to.

a close up of a compensation form on a computer screen

Especially for workers comp claims — and especially for companies that use TPAs (third-party administrators) — it’s crucial to have Total Processing Adaptability.

What we mean is that your claims system should let you manage everything you want to manage and to have an optimally flexible relationship with your TPA(s). And it entails the ability of that system to give you the reports you need to enable you to spot trends in your claims experience. Are claims being reported properly? What kinds of claims are prevalent? What types of injuries are most common? What body parts are most likely to be injured? What are the most common complications? What are typical recuperation or rehabilitation times for particular types of injuries?

Beyond that, Total Processing Adaptability means your claims system lets you control the flow of information. We’ve seen setups in which accident reporting goes straight to the TPA because the organization in question doesn’t have the technology to capture accidents. If you’ve got Total Processing Adaptability, you have first-report capability and can route accident reports to TPAs automatically, based on your business rules. The right choice of unbundled software — with no reliance on software provided by a TPA — means your data is yours. If you have multiple TPAs or want to switch TPAs, having your own claims software gives you a layer of protection; that is, an element of risk management that helps normalize your reporting and operations. That ensures one view of your data, regardless of TPA, insulating you from the negative effects of changing TPAs.

When we created Cloud Claims, we knew we wanted to give our customers Total Processing Adaptability. We wanted to ensure a first-class claims experience for claims managed in-house and those managed by a TPA. We wanted to automate workflows to eliminate manual processes. We wanted sending files to TPAs to be as easy as clicking a button. By freeing adjusters from administrative tasks, we wanted to let them concentrate on critical decision-making — and we wanted to supercharge every risk management department’s productivity.

You can’t completely manage the safety of your workers. But you can manage your workers comp claims. With the right TPA and Total Processing Adaptability, you can effectively manage those claims and reduce the costs of the claims that occur.

With the right claims system, you’ll be on your way to more efficiency, better outcomes, and fewer headaches.

Claims Flexibility

Safety First

We were doing some reading about claims in the transportation industry the other day because … well … because that’s what we do. During our reading, we happened to find a post on the website of HUB International. It was called, “Disruption Steers Fleet Operators Into 2021”. The post was full of sound insight and advice. But this, in particular, caught our eye:

Read more

Claims to Fame

The challenges in claims management are fairly common. While this list might not be exhaustive, those challenges include:

Read more